WA state officials say there are no 'concrete' plans or specific proposals in place about pursuing offshore wind turbines on Washington's coast. However, another group has stepped forward to voice disapproval of their consideration.

   Native tribes protest ideas, want to give input

Currently, WA State has 2 "unsolicited" proposals from energy companies that want to locate massive offshore wind turbines off the coast. We reported last week, that if the CCA (Climate Commitment Act) survives Initiative 2117 in November, several hundred thousand of dollars will be allocated to study their feasibility.

870 AM KFLD logo
Get our free mobile app

If I-2117 passes,, offshore wind turbines become much more of a moot point. However, according to Axios:

 "The Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, which represents 20 Washington tribes with treaty-protected fishing rights, sent a letter last week asking the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to halt all discussions of new offshore wind facilities until the tribes' concerns can be addressed."

These unsolicited (meaning the state has not sought out proposals) plans are:

  • "One, from Trident Winds, would cover an area of about 315 square miles about 45 miles off the coast of Grays Harbor and Pacific counties.
  • The other, from Hecate Energy, seeks to lease 403 square miles in a nearby area about 17 miles off the coast."

These companies have indicated they are aware of tribal and native lands, treaties, and limitations surrounding them. However, power transmission cables to bring the electricity generated to shore could also run through culturally protected areas.

The Native tribes are also concerned about what effects these massive groups of floating turbines would have on fish movements, migration, and other related factors.

LOOK: The most expensive weather and climate disasters in recent decades

Stacker ranked the most expensive climate disasters by the billions since 1980 by the total cost of all damages, adjusted for inflation, based on 2021 data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The list starts with Hurricane Sally, which caused $7.3 billion in damages in 2020, and ends with a devastating 2005 hurricane that caused $170 billion in damage and killed at least 1,833 people. Keep reading to discover the 50 of the most expensive climate disasters in recent decades in the U.S.

Gallery Credit: KATELYN LEBOFF

 

More From 870 AM KFLD